Sunday, April 27, 2008

Happiness.

If you haven't guessed, I am a young teacher seeking to better the education system, and therefore better the world. Although I normally strive to avoid saying blatantly idealistic statements such as the prior one, all young teachers carry this goal. We just have varying degrees of scale on which we hope to achieve this goal.
One of my chief principles in my educational theory is placing high value on Maslow's hierarchy of needs. (http://www.businessballs.com/images/maslow's_hierarchy_businessballs.jpg original model if you are unfamiliar) Most cognitive problem solving that we ask students to achieve occurs at the highest level, yet very little is in the formal curriculum to aid students to get there. One curriculum I am currently designing (available for free years from now) is a course on the varying definitions of happiness. In this course badly needed comparative religion will be taught, and students will be encouraged to examine happiness through a sociological, anthropological, and self-introspective way.
Today's first link goes to Sam Harris. After i spent about three hours trying to create an all encompassing definition of happiness, i discovered he already gave a definition almost exactly like mine.

The second link goes to my friend Alan Watts. Teachers beware, he takes a shot at the fundamental premise of our educational system. However being as its a common critique, lets keep and open mind.


How.do.you.define.happiness?

2 comments:

Unknown said...

So here's my English major contribution to your happiness curriculum: have you read Rasselas, by Samuel Johnson? it's a short book in which the characters basically travel all over the world talking to people to find out whether happiness is possible, and in the end I think they conclude that it's not really. I didn't like it very much actually, but it was interesting and as someone interested in studying happiness you might want to check it out. I didn't like it because the definition of happiness Johnson seemed to be using was not what I thought happiness was, and the approach was entirely too rational (oh, the Enlightenment) when I don't think happiness is really rational. It also has a famous passage about the purpose of art that I completely disagree with.

Mr. Good Times said...

Congrats on being the first to contribute to the pedagogical study. Thanks for the recommendations, it may have a place in my curriculum!